Posts Tagged ‘air traffic control’

Clear Skies Ahead For The Future Of Aviation According To FAA Predictions

June 15th, 2011

Right now, as a nation, we are still fighting to get over the economic recession we’ve been in, and other parts of the world is seeing its share of hardship as well, but as things begin to improve, we can look ahead at the promising things that are to come.  Great advancements in the air travel industry, for one, are welcome news.

The FAA predicts that by 2030 we will see an increase of more than 50,000 aircraft in the general vehicle fleet, and over 52,000 more pilots.  With so many more planes in the sky, they are expected to log about 38.9 million hours, which is around 15 million more hours than are now being logged.  With 50 million more industry positions and $3.6 trillion of international GDP likely to be tied into the field, aviation will not be hurting in any department.

New technologies will afford safer and more efficient flights for executive jet charter and commercial aircraft.  Better piloting systems will exponentially increase the safety of flight.  Using satellite radar instead of ground-based radar technology, more modern air traffic control set-ups have increased accuracy, assisting pilots and traffic controllers.  Both pilots and air traffic controllers will be able to view near-perfectly accurate displays of constantly refreshing output.  The system, termed ADS-B (Automatic Departure Surveillance Broadcast), will point pilots to nearby aircraft more reliably and give them a greater amount of time to determine courses appropriately.

Noise stifling advancements and an in-development engine from Pratt and Whitney is being equipped with the capacity to reduce around 20% fuel burn and carbon by-product, lowering both noise and air pollution.  With more eco-friendly technology being utilized, air travel will not only become less complicated, but also less wasteful.

For individuals who want to either charter a jet or fly on standard passenger planes, air transportation will in the very near term be even more of a safe bet.  Aviation is a necessary factor in today’s world, for the transportation of items and for many other aspects of business.  With more endowment of this area, we can only maintain our success as a global civilization.  With aviation’s big bearing on our everyday existence, the furthering of it will allow us all to stay satisfied in our lives.

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Blogger
  • Myspace
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • technorati
  • Newsvine
  • Friendfeed
  • social network

Air Traffic Control Striking In Spain

September 22nd, 2010

once again it seems that there are problems in the airline industry with more airline staff striking and this time it seems to be the Spanish air traffic control staff, it would seem that when it comes to this industry there is always something going wrong and I am not sure they are actually getting any less money than I am so what is the issue.

 

It would seem that they can strike and get away with it because thousands of people rely on them and they have the power not to be ignored by people, I know that if I went on strike there would not be many people that cared, they are really just upsetting the people that are hoping to go on their travels this week!!

 

The Nature Of The Strike

Like with all of the strikes in this kind of sector it is over money and this is really annoying because the chiefs of the company really couldn’t care less about these people and the only thing the people are doing is upsetting everyone else.

 

On the other hand I can understand where they are coming from, if they are not getting paid enough money for what they are doing then what choice do they actually have? They have most likely tried everything else and if their standard of living is threatened by low pay then I most certainly see their point.

 

The main issue is for the people looking to go on a Moraira holiday because they might not get to go on their vacation. Although the strike has said to happen on the 18th of August this has not been confirmed so it could all change so be warned!

 

Look out for those Spanish villa images still because the chances are something will happen to fix this whole mess up and you will still have your trip away!

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Blogger
  • Myspace
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • technorati
  • Newsvine
  • Friendfeed
  • social network

David Neeleman on Building an Airline in Fast-Growing Brazil (Across the Aisle, Part 1)

August 24th, 2010

I had the pleasure of speaking with David Neeleman last week on a variety of subjects. David is best known for founding JetBlue, an airline which effectively fired him after the operational melt down on that cold wintry Valentine’s Day weekend back in 2007. After that, he went down to Brazil to found Azul, which, not Across the Aisle from David Neelemancoincidentally, means blue in Portuguese.

Everything you’ve heard about David is true. He never stops working. In fact, our first call was supposed to be on Friday before his daughter’s wedding. Something else came up and we tried to connect on the Sunday after. Ultimately, he called me after walking off a redeye in New York on Monday morning. He thinks nothing of commuting down to Brazil. He is always thinking about a million things a minute. It’s impressive and, yes, tiring.

We had a wide-ranging discussion on everything from fleet decisions in Brazil to his departure from JetBlue. He’s still not happy about that and has a list of things that he thinks JetBlue needs to do. David doesn’t hold any punches, and that’s refreshing. But you’ll have to wait for part three for the JetBlue discussion. Today, we start with talk about Brazil’s fabled air traffic control system and the rapid growth and opportunity in the country. Tomorrow in part two, we’ll look at Azul’s fleet decisions.

planeline

Cranky: With Azul, you’re sort of following a similar path of rapid growth, low cost carrier [like JetBlue] – kind of filling a niche that hasn’t been filled before. I was reading an article recently saying some of the lessons you’ve learned. Every time you start with a new airline, you change things around a little bit. I’m curious with Azul, what are the things you’re doing differently, above and beyond what you’ve done in the past?
David Neeleman, CEO Azul Airlines: It’s much different in Brazil than in the US in a lot of ways. If you were to go down and fly Azul, you would not think there was any difference [compared to JetBlue]. But behind the scenes, there’s a lot of market stimulation, and a lot of different things that we do because the market is 1/3 the size of what it needs to be. When we started flying it was about 50 million; then it was 56. I think this year will be 65 but the number should be closer to 150 million.

Cranky: There’s clearly a lot of opportunity, but one of the issues in the past has been Brazil’s disorganized air trafic control system. Is that something that’s improving or are you just able to work with it the way it is?
David: It’s certainly improving. We’re used to seeing things move a lot quicker in the United States. Here it’s a learning process. They’ll get there. They’ve had, you know, the Gol crash . . . traumautized the country. But they’re very careful and they’re very proud of what they do have. We’ll work with it.

We’re not just concerned about the in-the-air stuff as we are the infrastructure on the ground. There’s plenty of infrastructure today in most cities, but as the market starts to grow, there’s going to need to be a lot of new construction of terminals, new tarmacs, parking, to handle the growth.

Cranky: Is the airport funding system similar to the US where they build and then the airlines end up paying or is government-funded with no reimbursement?
David: It’s an enplanement fee rate – they charge the equivalent of about $10 to $12 per domestic passenger depending on the airport. That goes to Infraero, and Infraero is the agency that governs most all the airports, so for one thing you have one group that does it all which is good. If you have a problem, you go to one source with local management. But they don’t have a lot of experience with temporary terminals and temporary facilities. . . .

We haven’t really had to do that before, because flying in Brazil was mainly for the elite, for the A and the B class. There’s A, B, C, D, and E in Brazil. And now that the C class is growing – there’s a hundred million people in the C class – and C class people are starting to get credit cards, half of them have credit cards. So we’re seeing a lot of new travel and a lot of people are traveling who have never traveled before. It’s easy to see it when you have flights between cities that have never had nonstop service before. Travel has been expensive and inconvenient.

Cranky: So the Azul target is the C class?
David: No, no. Our target is the A, B . . . [and more]. When I got down there, I was giving a speech, and one of the other airline guys came up to me and goes “look dude, you don’t really know what you’re talking about. We’re seeing more people travel but the people who always travel are just traveling more. We’re not seeing new travelers.”

But that’s what we’re seeing. We’re seeing both. We have one market, Viracopos to Salvador, which is kind of like São Paulo to Ft Lauderdale kind of thing. That used to have about 34 people a day. Today there’s over 500 a day. So, we’re seeing that growth in a lot of markets that just didn’t have air service before. It’s great to see.

planeline

Next up, we’ll dig in to Azul’s fleet choices and then we’ll touch on David bitterness with JetBlue.

Share/Bookmark


Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Blogger
  • Myspace
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • technorati
  • Newsvine
  • Friendfeed
  • social network

Southwest Says Mechanical Issues Are Beyond Its Control, But It’s Not as Bad as You Might Think

July 29th, 2010

Many of you have already heard that in its contract of carriage, Southwest has now decided that mechanical issues are outside the airline’s control. How do I know? Because I’ve received more email from readers on this issue than any other, I believe. It’s amazing how this has grabbed people’s attention. The reality of this, however, is not as dire as many are suggesting. Don’t get me wrong. I don’t like this move, but due to Southwest’s policies, this doesn’t change much.

Who cares if Southwest considers a mechanical problem under its control or not, right? You should, actually. Airlines make clear distinctions on how much they’ll help stranded customers depending upon whether it was due to circumstances within the airline’s control or not. Here’s a handy chart explaining what’s within airline control and what isn’t, traditionally.

Within Airline Control Outside Airline Control (force majeure)

Mechanical Weather

Drunk pilot Alien invasion

Crew scheduling problems War

Blind bag cart driver crashing into plane Sea kitten attack

Don’t feel like flying today Strikes

Can’t afford to pay fuel bill Airport power outage

Can’t find second engine Air traffic control delays

It’s relatively straight forward. If it’s something that an airline can have control over, then it’s the airline’s responsibility. But what’s the difference for passengers? If something is within an airline’s control, then the airline will generally pay for hotels and meals while you’re waiting. The airline will also, in many cases, put you on another airline if available. If the event is outside an airline’s control, then you’re on your own. The airline will get you out when it has a seat available on its own flights, but that’s about it. You’re entitled to a full refund in both cases, assuming there’s a cancellation or excessive delay.

So why do I say that this isn’t as big of a deal here for Southwest? Southwest doesn’t put people on other airlines anyway. If you have a problem on Southwest, you’re waiting for the next seat on a Southwest flight or you’re taking your refund elsewhere. So it’s really just an issue of meals and hotels, not nearly as big of a deal but still important.

Southwest Mechanical Force Majeure

For all airlines, the contract of carriage is the binding document regarding air transportation, so this move in Southwest’s contract of carriage (PDF) is worrying, but Southwest also has its Customer Service Commitment (PDF) which outlines what it will do when things go wrong.

The Customer Service Commitment clearly states:

. . . if circumstances within our control, such as aircraft “swaps,” cause you to miss the last possible flight (or connection) of the day to your destination,
our Customer Service personnel have the authority to arrange for overnight lodging. We will find a hotel or motel as near to the airport as possible, and at no additional cost to you. We may also arrange for ground transportation to the overnight facility.

If the cause of your inconvenience is not within our means of control, we will do our best to assist you by securing a discounted rate at a hotel or motel at or near the airport.

With the underlying definition of “circumstances within our control” being clarified, it does make me wary. If a flight cancels because a plane breaks and there are no more flights that day, Southwest is now clearly not obligated to put you in a hotel for the night. Whether that holds up in practice or not remains to be seen, but it’s certainly a concern.

Southwest says that it simply clarified the definition of this in its contract of carriage but that it didn’t intend to change policies. That may be true, but from a legal perspective, that doesn’t appear to be the case.

[Updated on 7/28 @ 1234p: Southwest has listened to everyone and further clarified its contract of carriage to say mechanical difficulties from other entities. Smart move. Read the post on the Southwest blog at http://www.blogsouthwest.com/blog/southwest-airlines-addresses-misinterpretation-regarding-contract-carriage]

[Original photo via Flicker user swanksalot]

Share/Bookmark


Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Blogger
  • Myspace
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • technorati
  • Newsvine
  • Friendfeed
  • social network

Awesome Drama Over easyJet’s Unreliable Operation

July 27th, 2010

If you’re outside of Europe, you likely haven’t been paying close attention to the awesome drama unfolding over easyJet. The airline’s operations appear to be falling apart and the founder is threatening to take the name away if it doesn’t improve. This is worthy of a TV special.

easyJet was started in 1995 by Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou. He slapped his famed “easy” brand with bright orange colors on the airline and it took off from there. The initial idea behind easyJet was to be like a Southwest Airlines – low cost, low fare EasyJet Delaysflying all around Europe but initially from its Britain base. I’ve always thought of easyJet as being Ryanair’s more convenient cousin. For example, easyJet flies most to primary airports while Ryanair focuses on alternates. easyJet also hasn’t gone to the extremes of cost cutting in terms of passenger amenities, but there’s a problem.

EasyJet’s on-time performance sucks, and for that reason, Ryanair is infinitely more convenient. You can follow FlightStats to see how dreadful easyJet’s performance has been on a daily basis, but the furor really came out of a report showing that the airline didn’t even get half of its flights out of Gatwick in the air on time in June. It’s not good.

Lots of excuses are coming out of the easyJet headquarters, but nobody really cares. Management has blamed air traffic control strikes, but other airlines don’t seem to be performing as poorly as easyJet. This is where it gets interesting.

Sir Stelios may be intricately tied with easyJet, but he’s pissed. Back in May, he left the board because he’s angry about the airline’s expansion plans, which he thinks won’t add value for shareholders. His family still owns 38 percent of the airline, but he stepped down from the board so he could act solely as a large shareholder to prevent management from going forward with these plans.

The on-time debacle has just added flames to the fire. When Ryanair chief Michael O’Leary came out swinging against easyJet and Sir Stelios for having a terrible on time record and failing to publish it, Sir Stelios got angry. He made it clear that he had nothing to do with it, and that led to one of the strangest things ever. In fact, I’m surprised it didn’t cause a rip in the space-time continuum.

O’Leary apologized. In print. No, he didn’t apologize to easyJet but rather to Sir Stelios for implicating him in the airline’s failures. Sir Stelios has taken that apology and started a crusade of his own against easyJet. He is now threatening the airline by saying that if on-time performance doesn’t improve within 90 days, he’s pulling the brand license. Yeehaw, this is getting good.

Sir Stelios had already been angry about the use of the brand, and this just adds flames to the fire. See, brand license requires that the airline generate at least 75% of its revenues from the core business of flying. This is meant to protect other easy-branded companies that have their own spheres. The airline, however, is arguing that the way that number is calculated is bull. So the two have been going at it in court.

In the end, this is just a disaster. How can an airline focus on running a business when its embroiled in a massive fight with its founder and 38% shareholder? It really can’t. I don’t blame Sir Stelios. He’s acting in his best interests, as he should. This whole thing is just a mess, and ultimately passengers will be screwed.

[Original photo via Flickr user alistairmcmillan]

Share/Bookmark


Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Blogger
  • Myspace
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • technorati
  • Newsvine
  • Friendfeed
  • social network
Air Flight Tickets